Save the Rookie Card!

Take a look at this picture of two Brice Harper cards from the recently released Topps Five Star Baseball…

2012 Topps Five Star Baseball – Bryce Harper Base and Auto

On the left we have the base card #’d 46/80 (that’s right – there are only 80 base cards of each player in this set) and on the right we have an autographed card of Bryce Harper #’d 060/150!!

Very nice cards, although both are a little chipped around the edges (don’t get me started!)

So what’s the big deal about these two cards that I should find the need to take up your valuable time?

Well if you look closely enough you’ll see that both cards are designated as Rookie cards!! And the problem with this is that I don’t believe that one of those cards should ever be classed as a Rookie!

The card on the right is an insert!! Surely…? It’s a certified autograph inserted at a completely different rate to the base card and with a completely different design to the base card!! The base card is the true RC… Has to be! Yet Topps sees fit to make them both Rookie cards!

Am I the only one out there that thinks there’s something slightly off with this?!?

The problem that we have here is indicative of how Topps seems to be treating Rookie cards these days… For me Rookie cards have been the driving force behind Baseball cards for years! Inserts of varying different types have arrived on the scene – from Refractors to Game-Used Memorabilia, and from Autographs to Cloth Stickers, and so on, and so on!!! But Rookie cards are still here as well… the only problem is that no-one seems to care any more!!

Sure… Who wouldn’t want to pull a 1/1 Dual Bat Barrel/Bat Knob Autographed Super-Refractor of Hammerin’ Hank? Fantastic!! Wow!!! Lets have a quick look at it… Mmmm, nice… Now into a top loader and bung it on eBay!!!

But weigh up this type of pull against the privilege of owning a 1954 Topps Hank Aaron RC? No contest surely?? We’re talking about owning a piece of history against a random flash-in-the-pan hit from a high-end box of Baseball cards.

The format of the modern Rookie card changed in 2006 when card companies (yes, there were more than one) started to designate official Baseball rookies with the MLB and MLBPA Rookie Card Logo. Under the new rules, a player becomes eligible for their first Rookie card when he first makes the 25-man roster of a MLB team and these guidelines were adopted to clarify any confusion for card collectors and Baseball fans!

Unfortunately the waters were muddied when Topps were still allowed to continue including prospects in their card products, resulting in further confusion as some collectors still see a players first appearance on a Baseball card as their Rookie card, regardless of any logo marking its ‘official’ designation.

I can’t help but feel that Rookie cards seem to be losing some of their potency and popularity. They just don’t carry the same weight as they used to do – which is a crying shame! Rookie cards need to be raised back to greatness once again! The Hobby needs to be seen to be embracing the Rookie card once more as an integral part of collecting! Collectors need to value a player’s Rookie over any potential box or case hit!

So what can we do about it?

Well Topps, if you’re listening, here’s a few ideas…

1. Sort out Bowman!! Too many releases with Bowman, Bowman Chrome and Bowman Draft. Consolidate all these into one BIG release after the season ends.

2. Get rid of the Prospects. While it’s nice to see future stars appearing on cards before they hit the Majors, all Prospect cards do is add confusion and clutter to an already confusing Rookie card market. This will remove any doubt as to which card is a players true Rookie card as it will appear in the same year as they make their MLB debut, not several years earlier as a Prospect card.

3. Stop adding the RC logo to parallels and inserts. Rookies shouldn’t be mini parallels, refractors, game-used relics or autographs (as per the example above). If a Rookie card is to be autographed then it should replace the the base card in the main set.

4. Make the Rookie card appear as one card (and one card only) in each release. In most instances this should always be the base card when and where applicable.

The important thing is to keep it simple!! Make life easier for us collectors who are trying to get hold of the Rookie cards of our favourite players! Only ONE Rookie per product, please!!

Rookie cards deserve to be held in much higher regard than they are being at the moment so let’s see things start to change!!

C’mon Topps!!! It’s all down to you!! Make us proud and show some love for the good ol’ Rookie Card!


4 thoughts on “Save the Rookie Card!

  1. You’re right, it is annoying! I returned to collecting after a four or five year hiatus. My mother-in-law would send me Topps factory sets for the occasional Bday/Xmas present but those are the only cards I owned from the last few years. When I joined COMC I made the decision to pick up a Ryan Braun rookie card – only to discover there are loads of them from 2007 featuring the nifty MLB-RC logo. However, the card that most would consider his rookie is from 2005 Topps Update. So I bought a variety of 2007 ‘RCs’ only to discover that none of them was the card I was really after. I did wonder why Braun RCs were so cheap – I assumed it was because of his off-field issues and his cards had tanked the way of Jose Canseco!

    So, I agree with you that something should be done. They could just get rid of the dang logo for me. Or ban the production of cards of players wearing their parent clubs’ logos and uniforms – a move I’m sure would not go down well with the prospecting crowd. I’m enjoying doing a spot of prospecting myself but I’ve bought non-MLB licensed stuff almost as much as I have Bowman. Unfortunately, the manufacturers (especially Topps) couldn’t give a rat’s. I don’t think they care how diluted their products have become. As long as people fall over themselves to buy stuff, they will continue to churn out 27 ‘RCs’, auto’d or otherwise, of anyone who hits the bigs.

    I’d take the ’54 Aaron all day, btw. I’m wanting to pick up some Milwaukee Braves cards (Aaron, Spahn, Eddie Mathews, and Bob Uecker, of course) when my budget will allow it. Need to sell some Bubba Starling’s first!

  2. I agree this is major problem with baseball card collecting. I’ve recently got back into card collecting and I’m strictly collecting football, because of this. I want to collect what I consider their true rookie card which actually seems to be a prospect card in baseball. Unfortunately trying to find out what their true rookie card is a difficult, time consuming task in itself. Personally, I think MLB should consider their rookie card as their first card after they are drafted (likely a Bowman type card as it is today) and put the RC logo on it to keep things simple.

  3. I do question whether it’s really up to Topps to define the RC, as that’s really a hobby concept more than anything. Over the years, the hobby has decided what does and does not constitute an RC, and while it was a convenience to have Topps give us the label, acceptance is up to the collecting populace in general.

    Nice blog!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s